Skip to content
modumatics Modular Infrastructure for Inclusive Housing Tran Thien Toan Ngo · PhD Dissertation

References

Full reference entries are aggregated here at the end of the manuscript and cross-referenced from each inline footnote callout in the body. Near-identical citations of the same work have been consolidated into a single entry. Entries are ordered alphabetically by first-author surname.

  • A. Abbott and A. Tsay, “Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology,” Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3-33, 2000.
  • Access Institute, Accredited SDA assessor — Update 2: Clarifications re the SDA Design Standard interpretations, 2020.
  • Access Institute, Accredited SDA assessor — Update 4 (amended), 2022.
  • E. Agirre and P. Edmonds (Eds.), Word sense disambiguation: Algorithms and applications, Springer, 2006.
  • E. Agirre, O. Lopez de Lacalle, C. Fellbaum et al., “SemEval-2010 Task 17: All-words word sense disambiguation on a specific domain,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 75-80, ACL, 2010.
  • C. Aiken, I. G. Ellen, and V. Reina, “Administrative Burdens in Emergency Rental Assistance Programs,” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 100-121, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.7758/RSF.2023.10.5.05.
  • E. Alasmari, P. Martinez-Vazquez, and C. Baniotopoulos, “A systematic literature review of BIM on LCC,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 11, Art. 1829, 2022.
  • L. Albantakis, C. Bernard, N. Brenner, E. Marder, and R. Narayanan, “The brain’s best kept secret is its degenerate structure,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 44, no. 40, e1339242024, 2024, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1339-24.2024.
  • B. Aldemir and B. Y. Ozkus, “Modularity in transition,” Open House International, 2025.
  • Arataumodular Design Group. (2022). Modular Coordination. https://www.arataumodular.com/app/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Modular-Coordination.pdf. See §3 “Multimodules”.
  • K. J. Arrow, The Limits of Organization. New York, NY, USA: W. W. Norton, 1974.
  • W. B. Arthur, “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events,” The Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 394, pp. 116-131, 1989, doi: 10.2307/2234208.
  • AS 1684.2:2021. Table 5.1 (floor-joist span) and Table 6.1 (wall-stud span) use dimension increments in 25 mm steps for stud width (90 mm, 120 mm, 140 mm) and 50 mm steps for plate section (35 mm × 90 mm through 45 mm × 140 mm). Citation by chapter cross-reference.
  • AS 1684 Residential timber-framed construction, published by Standards Australia. Part 2 (2006, current 2021). See Housing Industry Association summary: https://hia.com.au/resources-and-advice/building-it-right/australian-standards/articles/using-as-1684-for-timber-framing.
  • ASHRAE. (2013). Handbook of Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. Chapter 18: Nonresidential cooling and heating load calculations. Defines the skin factor (exterior surface area / conditioned floor area) as a determinant of envelope heat gain/loss.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Housing Occupancy and Costs, Australia, 2019-20, Cat. No. 4130.0, Canberra, 2022. One-bedroom detached dwellings constitute approximately three per cent of the Australian detached-dwelling stock, predominantly in narrow-lot inner-suburban contexts.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2021, dwelling structure (STRD), Australia: 10,852,208 private dwellings, 70.1 per cent separate houses. The ratio is offered as a scale indication only and not as a sampling fraction.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Housing: Census, 2021, released 28 June 2022. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/housing/housing-census/latest-release
  • Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code 2022, Volume 2, Part 3.8.5: corridor and accessway minimum width requirements; Standards Australia, AS 1428.1-2009 Design for Access and Mobility, Sydney, 2009: accessible-path clear widths.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings, 2022, released 4 July 2024. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/disability/disability-ageing-and-carers-australia-summary-findings/latest-release
  • Australian Building Codes Board, Livable Housing Design Standard, NCC 2022. https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/resource/standard/livable-housing-design-standard
  • Australian Building Codes Board, Livable Housing Design Standard 2022 (technical provisions), ABCB, 2022. https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2023/Livable-Housing-Design-Standard-2022-1.3.pdf
  • Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code, Volume 2: Building Code of Australia, Class 1 and Class 10 Buildings. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ABCB, 2022.
  • Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code 2022, Volume 2: Building Code of Australia, Class 1 and Class 10 Buildings, ABCB, 2022.
  • Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code 2022, Volume Two, Part H8 — Livable Housing Design, ABCB. https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/editions/ncc-2022/adopted/volume-two/h-class-1-and-10-buildings/part-h8-livable-housing-design
  • Australian Building Codes Board, National Construction Code Volume 2: ABCB Housing Provisions, NCC 2022. The thirteen-Section sweep (Sections 1 through 13, with the per-Section findings recorded) is reproduced and archived at experiments/ch8-cw03-ncc-volume2-sweep/sweep_report.md. The earlier spot-check had used the legacy NCC 2019 numbering, reconciled to the NCC 2022 Sections in the debt register.
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics, Population Projections, Australia, 2022 (base)-2071, released 23 November 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/population-projections-australia/latest-release
  • Australian Government, The Treasury, Intergenerational Report 2023: Australia’s future to 2063, August 2023. https://treasury.gov.au/publication/2023-intergenerational-report
  • Australian Building Codes Board. (2023). National Construction Code Volume 2: Housing Provisions. ABCB. https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/editions/ncc-2022. Current edition: NCC 2022 (effective May 2023 with 2024 amendments).
  • F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider (eds.), The Description Logic Handbook, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), chs. 2-4; Y. Kazakov, “RIQ and SROIQ are Harder than SHOIQ,” in Proc. KR 2008 (AAAI Press, 2008), 274-284; B. Cuenca Grau et al., “OWL 2: The next step for OWL,” Journal of Web Semantics 6, no. 4 (2008): 309-322; and, on recursive SHACL undecidability, H. R. Andersen, J. Corman, M. Krötzsch, and S. Rudolph, “Semantics and Validation of Recursive SHACL,” in ISWC 2018, LNCS 11136 (2018), 318-336.
  • C. Bairead and M. Norris, “Homelessness transitions, risks, and prevention across the life course,” Social Policy and Society, pp. 1-16, 2024.
  • Baldauf, A. S. F. (2004). Contribuição à implementação da coordenação modular da construção no Brasil. Federal University of Santa Catarina, dissertation.
  • C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000.
  • C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000.
  • C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark, Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), Ch. 3 (“What is Modularity?”) and Ch. 5 (“Design Rules: The Six Modular Operators”). Baldwin and Clark’s distinction between visible design rules (which coordinate independent work) and hidden module parameters (which can vary locally) is the structural precedent for positioning the pipeline as a hidden-parameter implementation conforming to the visible design rules supplied by the standardisation schema, the Governed Kernel Architecture, and the notation; the engine those rules govern is developed in Chapter 6.
  • Barequet, G., Rote, G., and Shalah, M. (2016). λ > 4: An improved lower bound on the growth constant of polyominoes. Communications of the ACM 59(7): 88-95. DOI: 10.1145/2851485.
  • Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Vespignani, A. (2004). The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(11): 3747-3752. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0400087101. Cited >4,000 times.
  • R. L. Baskerville, “Investigating Information Systems with Action Research,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 2, no. 1, Article 19, 1999.
  • T. Beach, Y. Rezgui, H. Li, and T. Kasim, “A rule-based semantic approach for automated regulatory compliance in the construction sector,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 5219-5231, 2015.
  • A. Beer and D. Faulkner, Housing transitions through the life course: Aspirations, needs and policy, Policy Press, 2011.
  • A. Beer, D. Faulkner, C. Paris, T. Clower, and G. Baker, Inquiry into Housing Policies and Practices for Precariously Housed Older Australians, AHURI Final Report No. 406. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2023.
  • R. Bellman, Dynamic Programming. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1957.
  • B. Bengtsson and H. Ruonavaara, “Introduction: Path dependence in housing,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 193-203, 2010.
  • B. Bengtsson and H. Ruonavaara, “Introduction to the special issue: Path dependence in housing,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 193-203, 2010, doi: 10.1080/14036090903326411.
  • D. M. Berry and E. Kamsties, “Ambiguity in Requirements Specification,” in Perspectives on Software Requirements, J. C. S. P. Leite and J. H. Doorn, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer, 2004, pp. 7-44, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0465-8_2.
  • P. Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977.
  • S. Brand, How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. New York, NY, USA: Viking Press, 1994.
  • J. Bringolf, “Barriers to universal design in Australian housing” (Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Sydney), 2011.
  • M. Bringolf, “Universal Design as a Strategic Tool for Improving Australian Housing,” in Universal Design and the Built Environment: International Perspectives, J. Bringolf, Ed. Sydney, NSW, Australia: NSW Government Architect’s Office, 2020.
  • British Standards Institution, BS 8300-1:2018. BS 8300-2:2018, BSI, 2018.
  • Brookes, A. (2005). Theory and Practice of Modular Coordination. In Open and Sustainable Building, CIB W104 Proceedings.
  • M. Brun and H. Langseth, “Aspects of uncertainty in digital building permit processing: A systematic literature review,” Automation in Construction, vol. 161, 105357, 2024.
  • P. Buneman, S. Khanna, and W.-C. Tan, “Data provenance: Some basic issues,” in Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2000), LNCS vol. 1974. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2000, pp. 87-93, doi: 10.1007/3-540-44450-5_6.
  • P. Buneman, S. Khanna, and W.-C. Tan, “Why and where: A characterization of data provenance,” in ICDT 2001 (LNCS Vol. 1973), pp. 316-330, Springer, 2001.
  • R. W. Burch, A Peircean Reduction Thesis: The Foundations of Topological Logic. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University Press, 1991.
  • Burnside, W. (1897). Theory of Groups of Finite Order. Cambridge University Press. Burnside’s lemma (the Cauchy-Frobenius lemma): the number of distinct objects under a group action equals the average number of objects fixed by each group element. Applied here: distinct free polyominoes = (1/|G|) × Σ_{g∈G} |Fix(g)|.
  • F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, and M. Stal, Pattern-oriented software architecture: A system of patterns (Vol. 1), Wiley, 1996.
  • L. Callaway, K. Tregloan, and L. Moore, “Audit of advertised housing and support vacancies for people with disabilities in Australia,” Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 422-442, 2020.
  • G. V. Calloo, M. O. Boateng, E. A. Agbe, and G. O. Boateng, “Shelter to survival: Unpacking the health impacts of housing insecurity across the life course,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 23, no. 1, art. no. 91, 2026.
  • J. Camacho-Collados and M. T. Pilehvar, “From word to sense embeddings: A survey on vector representations of meaning,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 63, pp. 743-788, 2018.
  • G. Cavallaro, L. Ferrante, A. Ferrante, M. Ferrante, and C. Mazzarella, “Designing for Change: Performative and Flexible Design Strategies for Adaptable Living Spaces,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 11, Art. no. 1677525, 2025.
  • Chakravarty, A. K. and Balakrishnan, N. (2001). Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations. IIE Transactions 33(7): 587-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170108936856.
  • J. Chapman, Timber Wall Framing. Canberra: Australian Building Research Board, 1981, p. 47; J. Jiang, L. Ottenhaus, and J. M. Gattas, “A parametric design framework for timber framing span tables,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 226-240, 2023.
  • Chapman, J. (1981). Timber Wall Framing. Studs are Consistently Placed @ 600 centres with Nogs. Is this the most Efficient Framing Arrangement? Australian Building Research Board.
  • R. Chasin, A. Rumshisky, O. Uzuner, and P. Szolovits, “Word sense disambiguation in the clinical domain: A comparison of knowledge-rich and knowledge-poor unsupervised methods,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 842-849, 2014.
  • Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2(3): 113-124. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1956.1056813. Introduces the Chomsky hierarchy; relevant here for the concept of grammar constraint direction: adding rules either restricts (eliminates strings) or extends (generates new strings) the formal language.
  • A. Chernev, U. Böckenholt, and J. Goodman, “Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 333-358, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
  • N. Chomsky, “Three models for the description of language,” IRE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 113-124, 1956; J. E. Hopcroft, R. Motwani, and J. D. Ullman, Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley, 2007.
  • J. Christensen, “Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Public Service Use,” Public Administration Review, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 203-217, 2020, doi: 10.1111/puar.13134.
  • Chuck Eastman, Paul Teicholz, Rafael Sacks, and Ghang Lee, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd ed. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018), Ch. 1 (“BIM Handbook Introduction”) and Ch. 4 (“BIM Design Tools and Parametric Modeling”). Eastman and colleagues describe the parametric-component library as the operational vehicle for component reuse across BIM projects, and they document the recurrent pattern in which a component’s parameters are insufficient to encode regulatory commitments, so the compliance check is deferred to a downstream rule-engine pass rather than carried within the component itself.
  • C. W. Churchman, “Wicked Problems,” Management Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. B141-B142, 1967.
  • D. Clapham, “Housing Pathways: A Post Modern Analytical Framework,” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 57-68, 2002.
  • D. Clapham, The Meaning of Housing: A Pathways Approach. Bristol, U.K.: Policy Press, 2005.
  • A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman, “Power-law distributions in empirical data,” SIAM Review, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 661-703, 2009; the maximum-likelihood-plus-likelihood-ratio protocol is out of scope here, whose claim is qualitative.
  • Clayton, T. (2010). Design of Steel Wall Studs with Service Holes. CAOFS.
  • J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 37-46, 1960.
  • T. D. Cook and D. T. Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 1979.
  • R. Coulter, “Housing: A life course perspective,” in Housing and Life Course Dynamics, Bristol: Policy Press, 2023, pp. 21-51.
  • J. Crawford and K. McKee, “Hysteresis: Understanding the housing aspirations gap,” Sociology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 182-197, 2018.
  • E. Crespi, R. Burnap, J. Chen, M. Das, N. Gassman, E. Rosa, R. Simmons, H. Wada, Z. Q. Wang, J. Xiao, B. Yang, J. V. Goldstone, “Resolving the rules of robustness and resilience in biology across scales,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2163-2179, 2021, doi: 10.1093/icb/icab183.
  • Cruz-Saito, M., Nishida, M., and Bonnin, P. (2007). Le tatami et la spatialité japonaise ; Un des aspects de la spatialité japonaise : le tatami module. Ebisu - Études Japonaises 37: 101-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/EBISU.2007.1483.
  • W. Cunningham, “The WyCash Portfolio Management System,” in Proceedings of OOPSLA 1992 Experience Report, New York: ACM, 1992.
  • J. Cuperus, “An Introduction to Open Building,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Group for Lean Construction Conference (IGLC-9), Singapore, 2001.
  • de Blok, C., Meijboom, B. R., Luijkx, K. G., Schols, J. M. G. A. and Schroeder, R. G. 2014, ‘Interfaces in Service Modularity: A Typology Developed in Modular Health Care Provision’, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 175–189.
  • R. Dechter, “Decomposing an N-ary relation into a tree of binary relations,” in Proc. ACM PODS, 1987, doi: 10.1145/28659.28679.
  • C. Della Santina, M. Bianchi, G. Averta, S. Ciotti, V. Arapi, S. Fani, E. Battaglia, M. G. Catalano, M. Santello, A. Bicchi, “Postural hand synergies during environmental constraint exploitation,” Frontiers in Neurorobotics, vol. 11, art. no. 41, 2017, doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00041.
  • Design methods of rotating sutra-case cabinets: a comparative study, accessed on November 9, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13467581.2019.1626734
  • Dewsbury, M., Tooker, M., and Fay, R. (2013). Results from the simulated use of mass-timber construction to improve the thermal performance of lightweight residential construction. Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering 10(2): 153-168.
  • E. W. Dijkstra, “The structure of the ‘THE’-multiprogramming system,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341-346, 1968.
  • J. Dimyadi and R. Amor, “Automated Building Code Compliance Checking — Where is It At?,” in Proceedings of the 19th CIB World Building Congress, Brisbane 2013, eds. S. Kajewski, K. Manley, and K. Hampson (Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, 2013), 172-185. Dimyadi and Amor’s survey establishes that automated compliance checking depends on a curated, schema-conformant entry pool; the pre-vetted library is our instantiation of that precondition for the SDA-aligned dwelling-design domain.
  • J. Douglas, D. Winkler, S. Oliver, S. Liddicoat, and K. D’Cruz, “Moving into new housing designed for people with disability: Preliminary evaluation of outcomes,” Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1370-1378, 2023.
  • C. Eastman, J. M. Lee, Y. S. Jeong, and J. K. Lee, “Automatic rule-based checking of building designs,” Automation in Construction, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1011-1033, 2009; W. Solihin and C. Eastman, “Classification of rules for automated BIM rule checking development,” Automation in Construction, vol. 53, pp. 69-82, 2015; E. Hjelseth, “Foundations for BIM-based model checking systems,” Doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2015, and E. Hjelseth and N. Nisbet, “Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up RASE methodology,” in Proceedings of CIB W78-W102 2011, 2011.
  • C. Eastman et al., 2009; B. Zhong, L. Ding, H. Luo, Y. Zhou, Y. Hu, and H. Hu, “Ontology-based semantic modeling of regulation constraint for automated construction quality compliance checking,” Automation in Construction, vol. 28, pp. 58-70, 2012; X. Tan, A. Hammad, and P. Fazio, “Automated code compliance checking for building envelope design,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 203-211, 2010.
  • C. M. Eastman, P. Teicholz, R. Sacks, and K. Liston, BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2018, ISBN: 9781119287568.
  • G. M. Edelman and J. A. Gally, “Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 98, no. 24, pp. 13763-13768, 2001, doi: 10.1073/pnas.231499798.
  • Egeblad, J., Nielsen, B. K., and Odgaard, A. (2007). Fast neighbourhood search for two- and three-dimensional nesting problems. OR Spectrum 29(4): 601-619. DOI: 10.1007/s00291-006-0064-6. Uses fill ratio (equivalent to BEI) as the primary objective for 2D nesting problems; near-ceiling values indicate efficient packing.
  • T. Eguchi, R. Schmidt, A. Dainty, S. Austin, and A. Gibb, “The cultivation of adaptability in Japan,” Open House International, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 73-85, 2011, doi: 10.1108/OHI-01-2011-B0009.
  • Ehrenkrantz, Ezra. (1960s). SCSD — School Construction Systems Development. California-based research programme. See Kelly, Bern. (1969). The SCSD report: Environmental systems for schools. In Industrial Design journal, vol. 16.
  • G. H. Elder Jr., “Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course,” Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 4-15, 1994.
  • G. H. Elder Jr., M. K. Johnson, and R. Crosnoe, “The emergence and development of life course theory,” in Handbook of the Life Course, Boston: Springer, 2003, pp. 3-19.
  • Engel, Heinrich. (1964). The Japanese House: A Tradition for Contemporary Architecture. Tokyo and Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle. Classic exposition, with the important corrective that the tatami mat itself is not the primary module (see Engel’s rebuttal of Gropius, 1960).
  • K. Erk, “Representing words as regions in vector space,” in Proceedings of CoNLL-2009, pp. 57-65, ACL, 2009.
  • S. K. Ethiraj and D. Levinthal, “Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 159-173, 2004.
  • Evins, R. (2013). A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22: 230-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.004. Reviews multi-objective building performance optimisation; discusses Pareto-optimal methods for combining compactness, energy, and buildability objectives.
  • P. Femenias and F. Geromel, “Adaptable housing?,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1035-1052, 2019.
  • P. Femenias and F. Geromel, “Adaptable housing? A quantitative study of housing adaptability factors,” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1035-1052, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10901-019-09655-w.
  • R. T. Fielding, Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures, PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2000, chs. 1 and 5; D. Garlan and M. Shaw, “An Introduction to Software Architecture,” in Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 1 (World Scientific, 1993), 1-39.
  • C. J. Fillmore, “Frame semantics,” in Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea, Ed. Seoul, South Korea: Hanshin, 1982, pp. 111-137.
  • L. Floridi, “The Method of Levels of Abstraction,” Minds and Machines, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 303-329, 2008.
  • P. J. Fowler, P. S. Hovmand, K. E. Marcal, and S. Das, “Solving Homelessness from a Complex Systems Perspective: Insights for Prevention Responses,” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 465-486, 2019.
  • A. Friedman, “Life cycle homes for adaptability, circularity, and sustainability,” Architecture, vol. 5, no. 2, art. no. 22, 2025.
  • M. P. Gallaher, A. C. O’Connor, J. L. Dettbarn Jr., and L. T. Gilday, Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry, NIST GCR 04-867, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004.
  • D. C. Galunic and K. M. Eisenhardt, “Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1229-1249, 2001.
  • A. Gawer and M. A. Cusumano, “Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 417-433, 2014, doi: 10.1111/jpim.12105.
  • R. Gijsbers and F. van Gassel, “Experiences with IFD building system,” ISARC, 2003.
  • Givoni, B. (1994). Passive and Low Energy Cooling of Buildings. Van Nostrand Reinhold. Chapter 3: Thermal mass. Demonstrates that interior bulk relative to perimeter exposure is a primary determinant of thermal lag in passive cooling systems; the domain rationale for the enclosure efficiency index (EEI).
  • G. Goldkuhl, “Design Research in Search of a Paradigm: Pragmatism Is the Answer,” in Proceedings of ECIS 2012, Paper 146, 2012.
  • Golomb, S. W. (1994). Polyominoes: Puzzles, Patterns, Problems, and Packings (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. The definitive reference for polyomino theory; introduces fixed, one-sided, and free polyomino classification and the enumerative results up to n=10. Originally published 1965.
  • Solomon W. Golomb, Polyominoes: Puzzles, Patterns, Problems, and Packings, 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), Ch. 1; D. Hugh Redelmeier, “Counting Polyominoes: Yet Another Attack,” Discrete Mathematics 36, no. 2 (1981): 191-203; William Burnside, Theory of Groups of Finite Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1897), Ch. XII; George Stiny and James Gips, “Shape Grammars and the Generative Specification of Painting and Sculpture,” in Information Processing 71 (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1972), 1460-1465.
  • N. Goodman, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Hackett Publishing, 1976 (originally Bobbs-Merrill, 1968). Goodman’s requirements of syntactic disjointness and finite differentiation are applied to the PlaniSyn system in the theoretical treatment at §3.3; this appendix documents the syntactic machinery through which those properties are achieved at the encoding level.
  • Goswami, M. (2018). An integrative product line redesign approach for modular engineering products within a competitive market space. International Journal of Production Research 56(22): 6985-7005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1364443.
  • S. Gregor, “The Nature of Theory in Information Systems,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 611-642, 2006, doi: 10.2307/25148742.
  • S. Gregor and D. Jones, “The Anatomy of a Design Theory,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 312-335, 2007, doi: 10.17705/1jais.00129.
  • S. Gregor and A. R. Hevner, “Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 337-355, 2013, doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01.
  • Grierson, D. and Khajehpour, S. (2002). Method for conceptual design applied to office buildings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 16(2): 83-103. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:2(83).
  • D. Grierson and S. Khajehpour, “Method for conceptual design applied to office buildings,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 83-103, 2002; P. Merrell, E. Schkufza, and V. Koltun, “Computer-generated residential building layouts,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 29, no. 6, art. 181, 2010.
  • Griffith, A. and Sidwell, A. C. (1995). Constructability in Building and Engineering Projects. Macmillan. Chapter 4: Design for constructability. Identifies boundary regularity, uniform module sizes, and edge alignment as primary constructability criteria for prefabricated building systems.
  • Grover, A. and Leskovec, J. (2016). node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. KDD 2016 proceedings. DOI: 10.1145/2939672.2939754. Cited >9,000 times.
  • N. Guarino, “Formal Ontology and Information Systems,” in Proceedings of FOIS 1998, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1998, pp. 3-15; T. R. Gruber, “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199-220, 1993.
  • J. Haber and M. Poesio, “Polysemy — Evidence from linguistics, behavioural science and contextualised language models,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 219-261, 2024.
  • N. J. Habraken, The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1998; S. Kendall, “Open Building: A Brief Introduction,” Open Building Institute Working Paper, 2021.
  • N. J. Habraken, Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. London, UK: Routledge, 2021 (reissue; originally published 1972), ISBN: 9780367857387; N. J. Habraken, The Structure of the Ordinary: Form and Control in the Built Environment (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998). Habraken’s foundational distinction between Support (long-life capacity) and Infill (short-life configuration) supplies the structural precedent for treating the library as a capacity layer on which a population of design instances is configured.
  • N. J. Habraken, Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. London, UK: Routledge, 2021 (reissue; originally published 1972), ISBN: 9780367857387.
  • G. S. Halford, W. H. Wilson, and S. Phillips, “Processing Capacity Defined by Relational Complexity,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 803-831, 1998, doi: 10.1017/S0140525X98001769.
  • Halin, R. (1973). Simplicial decompositions of infinite graphs. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 39: 142-149. Grid graph connectivity: a cell is interior if and only if it has no boundary edges; the proportion of interior cells to total cells is a graph-theoretic enclosure measure.
  • M. A. K. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold, 1994.
  • M. T. Hambisa and K. M. Kiely, “Life course socio-demographic circumstances and the association between housing tenure and disability-free life expectancy in Australia,” BMJ Public Health, vol. 2, no. 2, art. no. e000852, 2024.
  • E. A. Hanushek and J. M. Quigley, “The dynamics of the housing market: A stock adjustment model of housing consumption,” Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90-111, 1979.
  • T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009.
  • A. Hatchuel and B. Weil, “C-K design theory: an advanced formulation,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 181-192, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4.
  • J. Haugeland, “Analog and Analog,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 12, pp. 213-225, 1981.
  • J. Haugeland, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
  • Q. He, “Three essays on housing and social stratification,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Wisconsin-Madison, 2019.
  • B. W. Head and J. Alford, “Wicked Problems: Implications for Public Policy and Management,” Administration & Society, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 711-739, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0095399713481601.
  • L. Heaphy and M. Scott, “Path dependence, ‘lock-in’ and rural housing outcomes: Insights from Ireland,” European Planning Studies, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2412-2432, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1958759.
  • J. A. Heerde, J. A. Bailey, A. B. Kelly, B. J. McMorris, G. C. Patton, and J. W. Toumbourou, “Life-course predictors of homelessness from adolescence into adulthood: A population-based cohort study,” Journal of Adolescence, vol. 91, pp. 15-24, 2021.
  • R. M. Henderson and K. B. Clark, “Architectural Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 9-30, 1990.
  • P. Herd and D. P. Moynihan, Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York, NY, USA: Russell Sage Foundation, 2018.
  • P. Herd and D. P. Moynihan, Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. Russell Sage Foundation, 2019.
  • M. Herschel, R. Diestelkämper, and H. Ben Lahmar, “A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from?,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 881-906, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00778-017-0486-1.
  • A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75-105, 2004; R. J. Wieringa, Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2014, ch. 12 and ch. 18. The three dimensions also map, interpretively, onto Goodman’s notational requirements of character-distinctiveness, syntactic disjointness, and semantic correspondence, the adaptation to an empirical setting being the author’s.
  • A. R. Hevner, “A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 87-92, 2007.
  • B. Hillier and J. Hanson, The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, 1984; A. Turner, M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn, “From isovists to visibility graphs,” Environment and Planning B, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 103-121, 2001.
  • Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., and Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(1): 29-66.
  • E. Hjelseth and N. Nisbet, “Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up RASE methodology,” CIB W78 27th Conference, Cairo, 2010.
  • E. Hjelseth, “Exchange of Regulatory Formalized Knowledge as Normative Concepts in BIM Objects,” Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Construction Economics and Organisation, 2010.
  • E. Hjelseth and N. Nisbet, “Capturing normative constraints by use of the semantic mark-up RASE methodology,” in Proceedings of CIB W78-W102 2011, Sophia Antipolis, France, 2011.
  • E. Hjelseth, “Foundations for BIM-based model checking systems” (Doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Life Sciences), 2015.
  • J. H. Holland, Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Basic Books, 1995.
  • J. B. Horowitz, “Comparing Ostrom’s Design Principles to Habraken’s Open-Building Framework: Disentangling a Polycentric Built Environment,” Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 20, Art. no. e39, 2024, doi: 10.1017/S1744137424000092.
  • M. Iacoviello and M. Pavan, “Housing and debt over the life cycle and over the business cycle,” Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 221-238, 2013.
  • N. Ide and J. Veronis, “Introduction to the special issue on word sense disambiguation: The state of the art,” Computational Linguistics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-40, 1998.
  • J. Iivari, “Distinguishing and Contrasting Two Strategies for Design Science Research,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 471-478, 2015, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2013.35.
  • R. Imrie and P. Hall, Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. London, UK: Spon Press, 2001, ISBN: 9780415253819.
  • R. Imrie, “Housing Quality and the Provision of Accessible Homes,” Housing Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 387-408, 2003, doi: 10.1080/02673030304240.
  • R. Imrie, Accessible Housing: Quality, Disability and Design. London, UK: Routledge, 2006, ISBN: 9780415344449.
  • buildingSMART International, Industry Foundation Classes IFC4.3, ISO 16739-1:2024. The design commitment to maximising representational expressiveness for heterogeneous exchange is documented in Chuck Eastman, Paul Teicholz, Rafael Sacks, and Ghang Lee, BIM Handbook, 3rd ed. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018), Chs. 1 and 3.
  • International Organization for Standardization. (1983). ISO 1006:1983 — Building construction — Modular coordination — Basic module. Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/5470.html
  • International Organization for Standardization, ISO 2848:1984 — Building construction — Modular co-ordination — Principles and rules. Geneva: ISO, 1984; the M/2, M/4, M/8 sub-module hierarchy is set out at Section 4.2.
  • International Organization for Standardization, ISO 21542:2021 Building Construction — Accessibility and Usability of the Built Environment, Geneva: ISO, 2021.
  • International Organization for Standardization, ISO 16739-1:2024: Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries — Part 1: Data schema. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2024.
  • ISO 19650-1:2018, Organisation and digitisation of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including building information modelling — Information management using building information modelling — Part 1: Concepts and principles.
  • ISO 19650-1:2018, Organization and digitization of information about buildings and civil engineering works, including BIM — Part 1: Concepts and principles, ISO, 2018.
  • ISO 21542:2021, Building construction — Accessibility and usability of the built environment, ISO, 2021.
  • ISO 16739-1:2024, Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for Data Sharing in the Construction and Facility Management Industries — Part 1: Data Schema. ISO, 2024.
  • S. S. Iyengar and M. R. Lepper, “When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 995-1006, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
  • P. Jaccard, “Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines,” Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, vol. 37, pp. 241-272, 1901.
  • A. James, S. Rowley, and W. Stone, Effective Downsizing Options for Older Australians, AHURI Final Report No. 325. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2020.
  • M. Jarrar and R. Meersman, “Formal Ontology Engineering in the DOGMA Approach,” in Proceedings of CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2002, LNCS, vol. 2519, Berlin: Springer, 2002, doi: 10.1007/3-540-36124-3_47.
  • B. Jia, “Open building and its implementation in architectural education: From reality and practice to pedagogy,” in Proc. 23rd CIB World Building Congress, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2025, doi: 10.7771/3067-4883.1779.
  • Jiang, J., Ottenhaus, L., and Gattas, J. M. (2023). A parametric design framework for timber framing span tables. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 24(3): 226-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2023.2227432.
  • M. Johnson, The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • T. H. Jones and I. Song, “Binary equivalents of ternary relationships in entity-relationship modeling,” Journal of Database Management, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2-14, 2000, doi: 10.4018/jdm.2000040102.
  • Y.-K. Juan and N.-P. Hsing, “BIM-based approach to simulate building adaptive performance and life cycle costs,” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 8, Art. 837, 2017.
  • E. Kamsties and D. M. Berry, “Detecting ambiguities in requirements documents using inspections,” in Workshop on Inspection in Software Engineering (WISE 2001), 2001.
  • S. H. Kendall and J. Teicher, Residential Open Building. London, UK: E & FN Spon, 2000, ISBN: 9780419238300.
  • S. H. Kendall and J. Teicher, Residential Open Building. London, U.K.: Spon Press (Taylor & Francis), 2000.
  • S. H. Kendall, Open Building for Resilient Cities, Ball State Univ., 2018.
  • S. Kendall, “Basic principles of an infrastructure or Open Building model,” in Residential Architecture as Infrastructure, Routledge, 2021, pp. 17-32.
  • S. Kendall, “Open Building: A Brief Introduction,” Open Building Institute Working Paper, 2021.
  • S. Kendall, Residential Architecture as Infrastructure: Open Building in Practice. London, UK: Routledge, 2021, ISBN: 9780367361310.
  • S. H. Kendall, “Open Building: An Abbreviated History and a Look Forward,” Open House International, ahead-of-print (2025), doi: 10.1108/OHI-05-2025-0185. Kendall’s contemporary survey identifies the standardised-interface discipline as the operational mechanism through which Open Building’s capacity layer makes downstream configuration feasible.
  • A. Kilgarriff, “‘I don’t believe in word senses,’” Computers and the Humanities, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 91-113, 1997.
  • Klarner, D. A. (1965). Cell growth problems. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 17: 851-863. DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1965-083-5.
  • D. A. Klarner, “Cell growth problems,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 17, pp. 851-863, 1965; D. H. Redelmeier, “Counting polyominoes: yet another attack,” Discrete Mathematics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 191-203, 1981.
  • Klarner, D. A. and Rivest, R. L. (1973). A procedure for improving the upper bound for the number of n-ominoes. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 25(3): 585-602. DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1973-060-4.
  • C. P. Klingenberg, “Evaluating Modularity in Morphometric Data: Challenges with the RV Coefficient and a New Test Measure,” Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 565-572, 2016, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12511.
  • Knuth, D. E. (2011). The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 4A: Combinatorial Algorithms, Part 1. Addison-Wesley. Section 7.2.1.5: Generating all set partitions. Discusses restricted growth strings and canonical forms for combinatorial enumeration.
  • W. Kuechler and V. Vaishnavi, “On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 489-504, 2008, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2008.40.
  • M. Lagueux, “Nelson Goodman and architecture,” Assemblage, no. 35, pp. 18-35, Apr. 1998.
  • G. Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • K. J. Lancaster, “A new approach to consumer theory,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 132-157, 1966.
  • R. W. Langacker, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • R. W. Langacker, Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • J. H. Larkin and H. A. Simon, “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words,” Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65-100, 1987.
  • K. R. Larsen, R. Baskerville, and J. R. Venable, “Theories and Models of Design Science Research Validity,” Information Systems Journal, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 36-69, 2025.
  • B. Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005; M. Callon, “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation,” in Power, Action and Belief, London: Routledge, 1986.
  • M. P. Lawton and L. Nahemow, “Ecology and the Aging Process,” in Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, C. Eisdorfer and M. P. Lawton, Eds. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association, 1973, pp. 619-674, doi: 10.1037/10044-020.
  • Le Corbusier. (1954). The Modulor: A Harmonious Measure to the Human Scale Universally Applicable to Architecture and Mechanics. Faber and Faber. Original French edition 1948. Uses the golden ratio and human proportions to define a modular dimensional system.
  • B. Leupen, Frame and Generic Space, 010 Publishers, 2006.
  • H. J. Levesque and R. J. Brachman, “Expressiveness and Tractability in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78-93, 1987.
  • B. H. Liskov and J. M. Wing, “A behavioral notion of subtyping,” ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1811-1841, 1994, doi: 10.1145/197320.197383.
  • Livable Housing Australia, Livable Housing Design Guidelines, 4th ed., LHA, 2017. Silver-level criteria are the secondary reference inherited from the broader Australian-housing-accessibility framework; the NDIS SDA Design Standard 2019 (Version 1) remains the primary derivation source for the LV-category-conditional requirements captured in the library.
  • J. Loeliger and M. McCullough, Version Control with Git, 2nd ed. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2012.
  • P. Luna Herrera, “Supports for high tech,” M.S. thesis, MIT, 1990.
  • B. Lutolli, “An evaluation of housing flexibility after seven years: IBA Hamburg case study,” Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 28-37, 2021.
  • K. Lutolli, “Open Building Strategies for Adaptive and Resilient Housing,” Frontiers in Built Environment, vol. 7, Art. no. 619167, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2021.619167.
  • M. Lux and P. Sunega, “The Impact of Housing Tenure in Supporting Ageing in Place: Exploring the Links Between Housing Systems and Housing Options for the Elderly,” International Journal of Housing Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 30-55, 2014.
  • A. MacCormack, J. Rusnak, and C. Y. Baldwin, “Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the ‘mirroring’ hypothesis,” Research Policy, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1309-1324, 2012.
  • Malaysian Standard MS 1064 Guide to modular coordination, Part 1 (based on ISO 2848), cited in Modular Coordination in Construction, industry guide, 2011. See §2 “Basic module, sub-modules, and multimodules”.
  • J. M. Mandler and C. Pagán Cánovas, “On defining image schemas,” Language and Cognition, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 510-532, 2014, doi: 10.1017/langcog.2014.14.
  • S. T. March and G. F. Smith, “Design and natural science research on information technology,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 251-266, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
  • Marson, F. and Lopes, S. R. R. (2010). Automatic real-time generation of floor plans based on squarified treemaps algorithm. International Journal of Computer Games Technology (IJCGT). DOI: 10.1155/2010/624817.
  • P. McDonald, Medium and Long-Term Projections of Housing Needs in Australia, AHURI Positioning Paper No. 13, 2001.
  • D. H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems: A Primer, D. Wright, Ed. Chelsea Green, 2008.
  • Merrell, P., Schkufza, E., and Koltun, V. (2010). Computer-generated residential building layouts. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29(6): Article 181. DOI: 10.1145/1882261.1882330.
  • B. Meyer, Object-Oriented Software Construction, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1997. Design-by-contract supplies the precondition/postcondition/invariant form in which the interface vocabulary is governed.
  • P. Milgrom and J. Roberts, “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization,” American Economic Review, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 511-528, 1990.
  • Milton, H. (2018). International and National Standards on Dimensional Coordination, Modular Coordination, Tolerances and Joints. Interim Report, RILEM Technical Committee series.
  • Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Approved Document M: Access to and use of buildings, Volume 1: Dwellings, 2015 edition incorporating 2016 amendments, London: HMSO, 2016.
  • Mitchell, W. J. (1977). Computer-Aided Architectural Design. Petrocelli/Charter. Chapter 8: Generating and evaluating plan configurations. Uses compactness criteria in automated layout generation.
  • A. Mora, R. Bolici, and M. Deakin, “Assembling Sustainable Smart City Transitions,” Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1-15, 2020.
  • L. Moreau and P. Missier (Eds.), PROV-DM: The PROV data model (W3C Recommendation), W3C, 2013.
  • S. Morris and G. Spanoudakis, “UML: An Evaluation of the Visual Syntax of the Language,” in Proceedings of HICSS, 2001, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2001.926344.
  • D. P. Moynihan, P. Herd, and H. Harvey, “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 43-69, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1093/jopart/muu009.
  • E. W. Myers, “An O(ND) Difference Algorithm and Its Variations,” Algorithmica, vol. 1, no. 1-4, pp. 251-266, 1986.
  • M. D. Myers and J. R. Venable, “A Set of Ethical Principles for Design Science Research in Information Systems,” Information & Management, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 801-809, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.01.002.
  • National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 (Cth). Canberra, ACT, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
  • National Disability Insurance Agency, Specialist Disability Accommodation Design Standard, Version 1, October 2019. Geelong, VIC, Australia: NDIA. [The canonical SDA Design Standard cited thesis-wide; confirm the version digit against the copy used.]
  • National Disability Insurance Agency, Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) Pricing Review (outcome; new prices effective 1 July 2023), NDIS, 2023. https://www.ndis.gov.au/providers/housing-and-living-supports-and-services/specialist-disability-accommodation/sda-pricing-and-payments/sda-pricing-review
  • National Disability Insurance Agency, Specialist Disability Accommodation (SDA) data, NDIS Data and Research, 2025.
  • Navaratnam, S., Rahardjo, A., and Godakandage, R. (2025). An evidence-based assessment of the potential for upscaling prefabricated timber modular buildings. Buildings 15: in press.
  • R. Navigli, “Word sense disambiguation: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 41, no. 2, Article 10, pp. 1-69, 2009.
  • N. O. Nawari, “The challenge of computerizing building codes in a BIM environment,” in Computing in Civil Engineering (2012), pp. 285-292, ASCE, 2012; S. Malsane, J. Matthews, S. Lockley, P. Love, and D. Greenwood, “Development of an object model for automated compliance checking,” Automation in Construction, vol. 49, pp. 51-58, 2015.
  • NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, NDIS Practice Standards: Specialist Disability Accommodation, Australian Government, 2020, with the supporting Practice Standards Guidance issued for SDA enrolment.
  • NDIS (Specialist Disability Accommodation) Rules 2020 (Cth). Australian Government, 2020. [The legislative instrument that gives the NDIA SDA Design Standard legal effect; cited separately from the Design Standard itself, and only where the Rule, not the Standard, is meant.]
  • Nelson Goodman, Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, 2nd ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976), Ch. 4 (“The Theory of Notation”), 127-173. The criteria are domain-neutral conditions on character and compliance classes; Catherine Z. Elgin, “The Legacy of Nelson Goodman,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60, no. 3 (2000): 679-690, esp. 681-683, establishes that they apply across mediums and so license their application to formal-language design.
  • M. E. J. Newman and M. Girvan, “Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 69, no. 2, Art. no. 026113, 2004.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics 46: 323-351. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0412004. Synthesised in a secondary research synthesis on the Pareto principle and power-law dynamics.
  • M. E. J. Newman, “Modularity and Community Structure in Networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 23, pp. 8577-8582, 2006, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103.
  • F. Noardo et al., “Unveiling the actual progress of Digital Building Permit: Getting awareness through a critical state of the art review,” Building and Environment, vol. 213, 108854, 2022.
  • NSW Government Architect’s Office. (2020). Apartment Design Guide. NSW Government. Chapter 4: Designing for families and livability. Published space category conventions: bedroom, bathroom, kitchen, living, dining, laundry, entry/foyer, garage, study, outdoor living.
  • J. F. Nunamaker, M. Chen, and T. D. M. Purdin, “Systems Development in Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 89-106, 1991, doi: 10.1080/07421222.1990.11517898.
  • Okamoto, M. and Naito, A. (1984). Types of the Architectural Manuals “Tatami-Shikiyō-Hinagata” for the Floor Design in Japanese Traditional Architecture. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Japan.
  • On the tradition: N. J. Habraken, Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. London: Architectural Press, 1972; A. F. Bemis, The Evolving House, Volume III: Rational Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1936; E. D. Ehrenkrantz, The Modular Number Pattern. London: Alec Tiranti, 1961, whose corpus-specific Californian school grid is the cautionary case for inductive extraction that does not generalise.
  • On large-language-model annotation and multimodal-vision extraction: Z. Tan et al., “Large language models for data annotation: A survey,” EMNLP Findings 2024, arXiv:2402.13446; F. Gilardi, M. Alizadeh, and M. Kubli, “ChatGPT outperforms crowd-workers for text-annotation tasks,” PNAS, vol. 120, no. 30, e2305016120, 2023; R. Y. Pang et al., “Understanding the LLM-as-a-Judge: Position bias in pairwise evaluation,” arXiv:2406.07791, 2024.
  • R. Ong ViforJ and C. Leishman, “The economics of housing supply: Key concepts and issues,” NSW Parliamentary Research Service, Research Paper 2024-07, 2024.
  • Opsahl, T., Colizza, V., Panzarasa, P., and Ramasco, J. J. (2008). Prominence and control: The weighted rich-club effect. Physical Review Letters 101(16): 168702. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.168702.
  • Osborne, A. L. (1959). Modular Co-Ordination as Related To Sanitary Accommodation and Fittings. Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 79(4): 244-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146642405907900532.
  • E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002.
  • L. Pant, A. Nag, and N. Saxena, “Development of PLANiT as a toolkit for sustainable urban development,” Open House International, 2025.
  • Parliament of Australia, National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013, Commonwealth of Australia, 2013.
  • D. L. Parnas, “On the Criteria to Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 1053-1058, Dec. 1972, doi: 10.1145/361598.361623.
  • B. J. O. Pasello, R. Almeida, and J. D. M. Moura, “What Does Modular Mean? A Systematic Review on Definitions, Ambiguities, and Terminological Gap,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 17, Art. no. 3017, 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15173017.
  • K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45-77, 2007, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
  • C. S. Peirce, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-8, eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-1958, CP 1.300-353.
  • Penn, A., Conroy, R., Dalton, N., Dekker, L., Mottram, C., and Turner, A. (1997). Intelligent architecture: new tools for the three dimensional analysis of space and built form. Proceedings of the First International Space Syntax Symposium, London. Paper 30.
  • P. Pierson, “Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics,” American Political Science Review, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 251-267, 2000, doi: 10.2307/2586011.
  • D. Pierzchlewicz, A. Wozniak, and B. Widera, “Recent research on circular architecture,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 17, Art. 7580, 2025.
  • Polsby, P. O. and Popper, F. J. (1991). The third criterion: Compactness as a procedural safeguard against partisan gerrymandering. Yale Law and Policy Review 9(2): 301-353. Introduces the Polsby-Popper score (PP = 4πA/P²) as the standard compactness ratio for geographic and planning contexts; directly analogous to the isoperimetric quotient.
  • N. Prat, I. Comyn-Wattiau, and J. Akoka, “A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 229-267, 2015.
  • Productivity Commission, Housing Decisions of Older Australians, Commission Research Paper. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Productivity Commission, 2015.
  • Proportions of Wood Members in Japanese Traditional Architecture — A Comparison of the Kiwari-sho and Measurements of Building Remains, Sustainability 15(7): 5800, MDPI, 2023. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-5030/15/7/5800.
  • J. Pustejovsky, The generative lexicon, MIT Press, 1995.
  • J. M. Quigley and D. H. Weinberg, “Intra-urban residential mobility: A review and synthesis,” International Regional Science Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-66, 1977.
  • A. Rabeneck, “Housing adaptability: Some past lessons,” Buildings and Cities (Commentary), 2021.
  • A. Raganato, J. Camacho-Collados, and R. Navigli, “Word sense disambiguation: A unified evaluation framework and empirical comparison,” in Proc. EACL 2017, Valencia, Spain, 2017, pp. 99-110.
  • Rai, R. and Allada, V. (2003). Modular product family design: Agent-based Pareto-optimization and quality loss function-based post-optimal analysis. International Journal of Production Research 41(17): 4075-4098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000149248.
  • A. Rapoport, House Form and Culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
  • Redelmeier, D. H. (1981). Counting polyominoes: yet another attack. Discrete Mathematics 36(2): 191-203. DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(81)90237-5. Provides exact counts to n=24 for fixed polyominoes and the cell-addition algorithm used by most subsequent enumerators.
  • T. C. Redman, “The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79-82, 1998, doi: 10.1145/269012.269025.
  • H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber, “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning,” Policy Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 155-169, 1973, doi: 10.1007/BF01405730.
  • I. Robeyns, “The capability approach: A theoretical survey,” Journal of Human Development, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 93-117, 2005.
  • L. Robinson, P. Schlesinger, A. Rosenberg, K. M. Blankenship, and D. Keene, “‘Being Homeless Can Burn You Out’: A Qualitative Study of Individuals’ Experience of Administrative Burden when Accessing Homeless Services,” Journal of Social Distress and Homelessness, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 438-447, 2024, doi: 10.1080/10530789.2023.2237242.
  • A. G. L. Romme, “Making a Difference: Organization as Design,” Organization Science, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 558-573, 2003, doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769.
  • E. Rosch, “Principles of categorization,” in Cognition and Categorization, E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum, 1978, pp. 27-48.
  • P. J. Rousseeuw, “Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 20, pp. 53-65, 1987.
  • R. Sanchez and J. T. Mahoney, “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, no. S2, pp. 63-76, 1996, doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171107.
  • B. Scheibehenne, R. Greifeneder, and P. M. Todd, “Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 409-425, 2010, doi: 10.1086/651235.
  • M. A. Schilling, “Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 312-334, 2000, doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.3312918.
  • M. A. Schilling, “Product Modularity: Definitions and Benefits,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 295-313, 2003, doi: 10.1080/0954482031000091068.
  • R. Schmidt III and S. Austin, Adaptable Architecture: Theory and Practice. Routledge, 2016.
  • Schurch, R., Koenig, R., Meixner, H., and Stark, M. (2011). Performative urbanism: generative design in urban planning. In Proceedings of the 29th Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe). DOI: 10.52842/conf.ecaade.2011.413. Uses PAR/compactness as a generative objective for urban block configurations; directly analogous to EEI usage in the Plans Generator.
  • W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014; P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, “The Iron Cage Revisited,” American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147-160, 1983.
  • Secondary research synthesis on the orthogonal order, “Grid as platform”; cites a Harvard Kennedy School Spatial Institutions paper and ISO shipping-container standardisation as parallel cases.
  • See also the Malaysian and Commonwealth industry guides explaining ISO 2848’s sub-module system in practical building contexts; MC in Construction Industry, https://mummyku.weebly.com/uploads/5/2/5/4/52547687/mc_in_construction_industry.pdf.
  • M. K. Sein, O. Henfridsson, S. Purao, M. Rossi, and R. Lindgren, “Action Design Research,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 37-56, 2011.
  • A. Sen, Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985.
  • M. Serra Permanyer and J. Kuzmanic, “Anarquitectura frente al paso del tiempo,” Proyecto, Progreso, Arquitectura, no. 27, pp. 100-113, 2022.
  • C. E. Shannon, “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 379-423, 1948.
  • N. Sieben, “Polyominoes with Minimum Site-Perimeter and Full Set Achievement Games,” European Journal of Combinatorics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 108-117, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.ejc.2006.12.008.
  • G. Simmel, “Quantitative Aspects of the Group,” in On Individuality and Social Forms, ed. D. N. Levine, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971 (original 1908).
  • H. A. Simon, “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99-118, 1955.
  • Herbert A. Simon, “The Architecture of Complexity,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106, no. 6 (1962): 467-482. Encoding composition as recursive nesting over typed spatial units places PlaniSyn within the shape-computation and dwelling-grammar traditions (Knight’s computing with shapes and Duarte’s grammar for the Malagueira houses are the nearest precedents) which PlaniSyn extends from purely generative composition to compliance-checkable composition, the point of departure being that each PlaniSyn interaction is bound to a governed-kernel interface contract that the shape-grammar tradition does not require its relations to discharge. See Terry Knight, “Computing with Shapes,” Environment and Planning B 30, no. 4 (2003): 499-520, and José P. Duarte, “Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: The Grammar of Siza’s Houses at Malagueira,” Environment and Planning B 32, no. 3 (2005): 347-380.
  • H. A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1996, p. 5.
  • H. A. Simon, “Near Decomposability and the Speed of Evolution,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 587-599, 2002, doi: 10.1093/ICC/12.3.587.
  • E. S. Slaughter, “Design Strategies to Increase Building Flexibility,” Building Research & Information, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 208-217, 2001.
  • R. Sleimen-Malkoun, J.-J. Temprado, and S. L. Hong, “Aging induced loss of complexity and dedifferentiation,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 6, art. no. 140, 2014.
  • W. Solihin and C. Eastman, “Classification of Rules for Automated BIM Rule Checking Development,” Automation in Construction, vol. 53, pp. 69-82, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.003.
  • W. Solihin, “A simplified BIM data representation using a relational database schema for an efficient rule checking system” (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology), 2015.
  • Song, Z. and Kusiak, A. (2009). Mining Pareto-optimal modules for delayed product differentiation. European Journal of Operational Research 201(1): 104-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.013.
  • C. Sonnenberg and J. vom Brocke, “Evaluations in the science of the artificial — reconsidering the build–evaluate pattern in design science research,” in Design Science Research in Information Systems (DESRIST 2012), LNCS vol. 7286. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2012, pp. 381-397.
  • M. E. Sosa, S. D. Eppinger, and C. M. Rowles, “A network approach to define modularity of components in complex products,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 1118-1129, 2007, doi: 10.1115/1.2771182.
  • J. F. Sowa, Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine, Addison-Wesley, 1984.
  • M. Spallek, M. Haynes, and A. Jones, “Holistic housing pathways for Australian families through the childbearing years,” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 205-226, 2014.
  • E. R. Staehr, T. K. Stevik, and L. D. Houck, “Adaptability in the building process: A multifaceted perspective across the life cycle of a building,” Buildings, vol. 15, no. 7, art. 1119, 2025, doi: 10.3390/buildings15071119.
  • Stamps, A. E. (2010). Effects of permeability on perceived enclosure and spaciousness. Environment and Behavior 42(6): 864-886. DOI: 10.1177/0013916509341499. Reviews the enclosure literature; defines perceived enclosure as the solid share of the spatial boundary, a construct related to but distinct from the generator’s geometric enclosure index (EEI).
  • Standards Australia, AS 1428.1-2009 Design for Access and Mobility, Part 1: General Requirements for Access — New Building Work, Sydney: Standards Australia, 2009: grab-rail dimensional and loading specifications; Standards Australia, AS 3661.1-1993 Slip Resistance of Pedestrian Surfaces, Part 1: Requirements, Sydney: Standards Australia, 1993: slip-resistance classification scheme.
  • Standards Australia, AS 1428.1:2021 Design for Access and Mobility, Part 1: General Requirements for Access — New Building Work. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Standards Australia, 2021.
  • Standards Australia, AS 1428.1:2021, Sydney, 2021.
  • Standards Australia, AS 1428.1:2021 Design for Access and Mobility, Part 1. Standards Australia, 2021.
  • A. Stefanowitsch, Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology. Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press, 2020, pp. 115-118.
  • Steinhardt, D. A. (2014). The Importance of Home. Chapter on Australian Building Code evolution. Discussion of Building Code of Australia precursors and performance-based reform.
  • Stiny, G. and Gips, J. (1972). Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. Information Processing 71: 1460-1465. Proceedings of IFIP Congress 71. The founding paper; introduces the concept of a production rule that replaces one shape with another, generating a potentially infinite class of designs from a finite rule set.
  • G. Stiny and J. Gips, “Shape grammars and the generative specification of painting and sculpture,” Information Processing 71, pp. 1460-1465, 1972.
  • Stiny, G. (1975). Pictorial and Formal Aspects of Shape and Shape Grammars. Birkhäuser. The definitive early monograph; formalises the shape grammar as a tuple ⟨S, L, R, I⟩ where S is the shape algebra, L is the label set, R is the rule set, and I is the initial shape.
  • Stiny, G. (1980). Kindergarten grammars: designing with Froebel’s building gifts. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7(4): 409-462. DOI: 10.1068/b070409. Develops shape grammars for architectural design using Froebel’s building blocks; introduces junction rules and composition operations for combining shape elements.
  • G. Stiny, “Introduction to shape and shape grammars,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 343-351, 1980, doi: 10.1068/b070343; T. W. Knight, “Shape grammars: Six types,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 15-31, 1999, doi: 10.1068/b260015; J. P. Duarte, “Towards the mass customization of housing: the grammar of Siza’s houses at Malagueira,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 347-380, 2005, doi: 10.1068/b31124, exhibits an applied shape-grammar that emits compliance-bearing housing variants under explicit, traceable rule applications, the closest precedent in the literature to the present combination of declared-grammar generation and compliance-bearing emission.
  • G. Stiny, “Kindergarten grammars,” Environment and Planning B, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 409-462, 1980.
  • W. Stone, A. Sharam, I. Wiesel, L. Ralston, S. Markkanen, and A. James, Accessing and Sustaining Private Rental Tenancies, AHURI Final Report No. 259. Melbourne: AHURI, 2015.
  • W. Stone, A. Sharam, I. Wiesel, L. Ralston, S. Markkanen, and A. James, Accessing and Sustaining Private Rental Tenancies: Critical Life Events, Housing Shocks and Insurances, AHURI Final Report No. 259, 2015.
  • S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2018.
  • K. J. Sullivan, W. G. Griswold, Y. Cai, and B. Hallen, “The Structure and Value of Modularity in Software Design,” in Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference / 9th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE-9), Vienna, Austria, 2001, pp. 99-108, doi: 10.1145/503209.503224.
  • S. L. Szanton et al., “CAPABLE Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nurse, Occupational Therapist and Handyman to Reduce Disability Among Older Adults: Rationale and Design,” Contemporary Clinical Trials, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 102-112, 2014.
  • L. Talmy, Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000.
  • The FIRST/FOLLOW construction and the disjointness conditions defining the LL(1) class are standard; see Alfred V. Aho, Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey D. Ullman, Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1986), Ch. 4, Section 4.4, 181-215. The context-free grammar as Chomsky Type 2 is set out in Michael Sipser, Introduction to the Theory of Computation, 3rd ed. (Boston, MA: Cengage, 2013), Ch. 2, Sections 2.1-2.4, 99-148.
  • The polysemy among SDA-domain terms (on the order of three in five eligible terms) is established empirically in Chapter 5 and grounded theoretically in J. Pustejovsky, The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, 1995.
  • The two laws are W(id_X) = id_{W(X)} and W(g ∘ f) = W(g) ∘ W(f) in the sense of Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd ed. (New York: Springer, 1998), Definition I.3, 13-14. They hold here by the extension-point token-reservation, identifier-convention, desugaring, and formal-core-immutability clauses of the extensibility contract (EXP-7.6, clauses EC-01, EC-04, EC-08, EC-10) rather than by an independent categorical computation: the notation desugars text under a fixed discipline, and the laws are a consequence of that discipline. The same property grounds the architectural contribution restated in Section 7.20.
  • The foundational capability claims this family inherits are established by T. B. Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), 2020, arXiv:2005.14165; R. Bommasani et al., “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models,” Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models, 2021, arXiv:2108.07258, which explicitly catalogues regulatory and compliance-adjacent documentation among the deployment domains of non-trivial risk; and OpenAI, “GPT-4 technical report,” 2023, arXiv:2303.08774. The argument depends not on any single application paper but on the architectural pattern they collectively share: generative emission without an enforced governance contract over the substrate from which the emission is drawn.
  • A. Tiwana, B. Konsynski, and A. A. Bush, “Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics,” Information Systems Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 675-687, 2010, doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0323.
  • A. Tiwana, B. Konsynski, and A. A. Bush, “Research Commentary — Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics,” Information Systems Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 675-687, 2010.
  • J. Togelius, G. N. Yannakakis, K. O. Stanley, and C. Browne, “Search-Based Procedural Content Generation: A Taxonomy and Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 172-186, 2011; G. Smith and J. Whitehead, “Analyzing the expressive range of a level generator,” in Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games (PCGames ’10), ACM, 2010; K. Compton, Casual Creators: Defining a Genre of Autotelic Creativity Support Systems, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz, 2019.
  • W. M. K. Trochim and J. P. Donnelly, The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 3rd ed. Mason, OH: Atomic Dog/Cengage Learning, 2008.
  • Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., and Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 103-121. DOI: 10.1068/b2720.
  • A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, pp. 1124-1131, 1974, doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
  • Ulrich, K. T. 1995, ‘The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm’, Research Policy, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 419–440.
  • J. E. van Aken, “Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 219-246, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x.
  • J. van Ommeren and M. van Leuvensteijn, “New evidence of the effect of transaction costs on residential mobility,” Journal of Regional Science, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 681-702, 2005.
  • A. E. M. van Vianen, “Person-environment fit: A review of its basic tenets,” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 5, pp. 75-101, 2018.
  • J. R. Venable, “The Role of Theory and Theorising in Design Science Research,” in Proc. DESRIST 2006, pp. 1-18, 2006.
  • J. R. Venable, J. Pries-Heje, and R. Baskerville, “FEDS: A Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research,” European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 77-89, 2016, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2014.36.
  • J. G. Walls, G. R. Widmeyer, and O. A. El Sawy, “Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS,” Information Systems Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36-59, 1992, doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.36.
  • R. Y. Wang and D. M. Strong, “Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 5-33, 1996, doi: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099.
  • Wei, W., Liu, A., Lu, S., and Wuest, T. (2015). A multi-principle module identification method for product platform design. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A 16(1): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/JZUS.A1400263.
  • Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton University Press. Chapter 2: Translatory, rotational, and reflective symmetry. The classical reference for symmetry group theory in a form accessible to non-mathematicians.
  • S. Whelan, K. Atalay, G. Barrett, and R. Edwards, Moving, Downsizing and Housing Equity Consumption Choices of Older Australians, AHURI Final Report No. 321. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, 2019.
  • R. J. Wieringa, Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2014, ch. 12 (“Validation Research”) and ch. 18 (“Sample-Based Generalisation”).
  • Yigit, A. S. and Allahverdi, A. (2003). Optimal selection of module instances for modular products in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research 41(17): 4063-4074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000149220.
  • R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.
  • Yraola, F. A. D. (1966b). La técnica de proyecto en la coordinación dimensional. Same journal.
  • Yraola, F. A. D. (1966c). Problemas específicos de la coordinación dimensional. Same journal.
  • F. Yu, B. Wang, J. Sheng, X. Lv, X. Jin, and G. Chen, “Adaptive housing with skeleton–infill (SI) system,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 329, Art. 115298, 2025.
  • J. Zhang and N. M. El-Gohary, “Semantic NLP-Based Information Extraction from Construction Regulatory Documents for Automated Compliance Checking,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000346.
  • J. Zhang and N. M. El-Gohary, “Integrating Semantic NLP and Logic Reasoning into a Unified System for Fully-Automated Code Checking,” Automation in Construction, vol. 73, pp. 45-57, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.027.
  • Z. Zhang, L. Ma, and N. Nisbet, “Unpacking ambiguity in building requirements to support automated compliance checking,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 5, 2023.